It’s good that you make the buildings touch each other, but roads and buildings should’nt touch each other.

It might be a smart idea to make the woods larger. Especially if they were to be considered woods. And it would be more realistic (in my opinion) if there was a lot of green surrounding the lake.

I think the layout is very well done, but you have to keep the density in mind. If you want very big buildings this layout may work, but this layout is more suited for suburban homes. And also not very close to the center. You also need to think about the style, city centers are usually very interlocked with their roads, and in most countries the suburbs are too. But if you had an American suburb in mind for example, the roads are less interlocked and have a lot of cul-de-sacs.

I think this is a very creative idea, but it is a requierement that you tag this road appropriately instead of putting unclassified.

This looks really nice! If you want you can add adress tags; I usually do this, but in this case it isn’t really necessary. It is still nice, the most important tags are “addr:country”, “addr:city”, “addr:street” and “addr:housenumber”. But this isn’t necessary!

I’d like to point out again, that buildings shouldn’t touch roads or paths. So this is definitely an issue you should fix.

I think having this kind of setup is more likely to be in the more rural areas of a region, and not so near a shopping center or so near to the urban areas.