Lake Hetzer

Posted by ADB52 on 13 March 2017 in English.

Just wondering with all the water flowing into Lake Hetzer (western Uletha) nowadays, where is it all going? I gather there was a plan to create a gulf in eastern Vinnmark. Else, we’d have to reverse one of the rivers flowing into it. Throwing it into the group of territories fronting this beautiful lake.

Discussion

Comment from Pawl on 14 March 2017 at 07:27

There has been a proposal to extend the gulf, but it hasn’t yet been definitely agreed by all concerned - including admins. This was the proposal by joschi81:

Vinn Gulf idea

If everyone agrees, I’d be happy to have a go at mapping it. I would really like this to be resolved one way or the other because it has an effect on Tircambry, which I am busy re-structuring at the moment.

Comment from Friedrich Kirchen on 14 March 2017 at 09:22

I agree with the proposal if the Hetzer lake is part of the gulf or connected with it by a canal :)

Comment from ADB52 on 14 March 2017 at 09:27

I’d be quite happy with that proposal, but will await full agreement by all concerned.

Comment from trabantemnaksiezyc on 14 March 2017 at 10:06

I agree with Friedrich, current Hetzer needs to stay. The gulf would exist not only to connect Welstand-Westrijk to the rest of the world but to connect the whole region.

Comment from ADB52 on 14 March 2017 at 12:37

Think that leaves Severak (who runs Koban) to agree, if he hasn’t already, regarding Hetzer. The larger plan affects more users, obviously. Will await developments.

Comment from wangi on 14 March 2017 at 16:54

Is this what you’re all wanting: Imgur

Comment from trabantemnaksiezyc on 14 March 2017 at 17:57

Yup. That’s it.

Comment from Friedrich Kirchen on 14 March 2017 at 19:25

That’s it

Comment from ADB52 on 14 March 2017 at 21:26

That’s it.

Comment from wangi on 14 March 2017 at 22:05

Well, pending agreement I’ve uploaded - relatively low res - ways representing that coastline as relation 61058. Simple to delete or to remove the relation and join the ways into the coastline.

Comment from ilikemaps on 15 March 2017 at 05:18

My country is on the other side of the world but it looks good, but would countries of that region call it a firth

Comment from wangi on 15 March 2017 at 09:43

I wouldn’t worry about what i put in the name field of that temporary relation. The relation will be deleted once the coastline is agreed. Folk can then agree on whatever name they want (hence “proposed gulf/sound/fjord/firth” in my commit message).

Comment from Severak on 17 March 2017 at 11:25

This will make create exclaves of Estinesia.

I propose to change borders of Estinesia after this is is approved.

Comment from wangi on 17 March 2017 at 13:44

Yup, that’s the idea with the red arrows on the proposal - it’s where the boundaries change.

Comment from wangi on 17 March 2017 at 16:52

I’m currently working on the edits to implement this.

Comment from bhj867 on 17 March 2017 at 17:08

Thank God! Im not even affected by this but I’m glad someone is finally getting this done. It’s been talked about fooorrreeeeevvvveeerrr

Comment from wangi on 17 March 2017 at 18:41

Yeah, I know - nowhere near where i normally edit either.

Ok, so that should be it basically in. The various boundary relations were in a bit of a mess to start with - incomplete, unordered, duplicate or even weirder situations. So they should be good now, and expanded.

Obviously give it a bit of time for the coastline renderer to catch up.

Comment from wangi on 17 March 2017 at 22:53

I avoided the Tircambry boundary, given the ongoing reduction of its size.

Comment from ADB52 on 17 March 2017 at 23:05

Caught a glimpse of the new coastline, that looks great. Thank you. At least all that water can now flow down to the sea.

Comment from Pawl on 18 March 2017 at 13:22

Did the admins give the final go-ahead for this? Last I saw, Thilo would personally look favourably on this change, but the admins had not given their collective approval.

Assuming it is approved, I’m OK with taking a bit more land and coastline in this area for Tircambry, if Joschi81 is still agreeable.

Comment from wangi on 18 March 2017 at 13:52

Yes, I got agreement from the admin team. L

Comment from Friedrich Kirchen on 18 March 2017 at 15:10

YES! finally

Comment from Friedrich Kirchen on 18 March 2017 at 15:10

YES! finally

Comment from Pawl on 19 March 2017 at 10:10

Sorry I asked, Wangi - glad it’s all official :)

@Joschi81, is this OK for a new Tircambry/Ísztianország border? :

Tircambry-new-southern-border

Leave a comment

Log in to leave a comment