Discussion

Comment from skquinn on 16 August 2016 at 22:03

How does Rhododactylia measure up regarding name density?

Comment from Luciano on 17 August 2016 at 00:21

I made some quick .poly files and did some analysis. Based on backup file dated 8/15 (the 8/16 backup appears defective):

Rhododactylia totals: 10840 names; 247359 km sq (land); est population 4400000; = 2.46 names / thousand people; = 0.04 names / sq km

Frogtown only totals: 2274 names; 102.22 km sq (land); est population 225000; = 10.11 names / thousand people; = 22.25 names / sq km

Given Tárrases is currently at 3442 names for 390100 = 8.8, that means that Frogtown holds the OGF record for name detail quality of all the places I’ve analyzed.

Congratulations!

The thing Frogtown needs more than anything else right now is the natural tagging (wood, scrub, grassland, etc.) to give some indication of topography… and/or, if you’re ambitious, a tentative Topo/contour map. You’re one of the few OGF users where I’d recommend NOT focusing on names - heh.

Happy mapping

Leave a comment

Log in to leave a comment